About Me

Name: Mark B.
Location: Rockland, MA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Big Media I

Big Media I

In what has proven to be one of the strangest presidential election years in the modern era, both the Democrats, and the Republicans have in turn squandered their opportunity to put forth a 'can't miss' standard bearer who might have steamrolled the competition. In a year when a President who is publicly loathed by both the print & electronic media equally, the Democratic Party's presidential nominee should be able to score a decisive victory. Yet the party's power brokers and, the more influential than most Super-Delegates seemed poised, even determined to have as their nominee an apparently indecisive, obviously inexperienced, though hopeful pretender. That he is a man of color should not have mattered but there was no mistaking that at least for some it was certainly part, even a major part of the reason they gave their support to the less than one term senator from Illinois.

Thus, in a year when the Democrats stand to increase their already existing majorities in Congress perhaps to super-majority status (if certain political analysts are correct) their party should be able to run anybody for President and win! Having Big Media as an ally certainly couldn't hurt either. But a funny thing happened to Big Media's - "you can't call us racists" - pick on the way to victory lane.
The casual observer, many of them voters not yet engaged in the process started to take note when Barak put two sentences out there for everyone to digest. In sticking with Rev.Wright, candidate Obama stated he "could no more seperate himself" from his crazy uncle Jerry than he could seperate himself from the black community. And as if that wasn't bad enough his total lack of concern for his 'typical white' grandmother as he threw her under the bus was confusing to most voters. Most white voters at least.
Obama's well documented Twenty Year association with Trinity United Church in Chicago and, his multiple rationalizations in defense of Reverend Jeremiah Wright, a man he has called his "spiritual mentor" brought closer scrutiny than the candidate was prepared to handle, even with Big Media trying to bury the story. Ironically, Barak Obama's vaunted Race in America Speech was an open invitation for one and all to get to know more about the church ministered by Rev.Wright and, the Trinity United parishoners as well.
Around blogs and, dinner tables alike began discussions and, the topic of the day was the "Doctrine of Black Theology". Despite Big Media not giving the story a fair airing word got out and, has given voters...no, let's be honest, it has given white voters reason for a closer inspection of Barak Hussein Obama.
 
To be sure it was not what white Americans thought they would see. An even bigger shock was to then be told Trinity United is representative of the majority of black churches today! A large number of white voters had been treated to a peek into the closet that holds the skeletal remains of racism and, there was still plenty of meat on them bones. The animosity towards whites so blatantly obvious in the black community it cannot be shrugged off as 'reverse-racism', besides there is no such thing really. Racism is...or is not, there is not grey area. And suddenly, it was beginning to look like Big Media had fashioned their "Messiah" out of whole cloth. It was even beginning to look like the candidate Obama, was himself a racist.
When we finally came eyeball to eyeball with Father Pflegger, were not shocked to find he is yet another spiritual advisor to Obama from some point in the Senator's career. And if we, the white voters who question Barak's capacity to run the country were supposed to think - "Oh look! Even white Catholic Priests feel the same way!" - it didn't work.
The average person was, as they should be, as appalled at Fr.Plegger's rhetoric as they were at Rev.Wright's. But at least Fr.Phlegger gave Barak a way to 'distance himself' from Trinity and, he could point to the white guy's sermon as being the reason. In Barak's world Fr.Phlegger is actually the 'crazy, third cousin', on grandma's side of course.
Big Media has done its level best to make the claim that Senator Obama's parish of the past 20 years, Trinity Church, has not affected his standing in the polls. Incredibly, they overlook the cold, hard fact of their guy's not winning consistantly, nor anything big since February. Worse yet, they went past the point of being forced to grovel in front of Hillary, surely by now the punishment would be much, much more degrading and, definately something the manly men of Big Media are not willing to do. So they are now stuck with Obama as their Democratic Party nominee.
With still, over 90% of black voters turning out supporting Obama, white voters are left asking "Why?"
Is it actually JUST the color of skin that makes him acceptable to black Americans? If just one Barak Obama supporter can honestly tell me that Barak is the best, the most qualified black man available for the job of President Of The United States, then I might reconsider my position as to just how dangerous this novice, undistinquished Senator actually is. But please don't even think about using all that messianic, meaningless, 'change' & 'hope' b.s..
Every voter deserves an honest answer to whatever questions they have. Obama's generic answers, his many gaffes and, blunders when speaking off the cuff, without aid of a written page or teleprompter just don't cut it for me. "Words. Just words." to quote the candidate himself.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Big Media II

Big Media II

That Big Media openly despises the sitting President and, that 'It' takes every opportunity to tell the world of their disastifaction comes as no surprise to anyone paying attention. One major network (NBC) even went so far as to misrepresent a videotaped question & answer segment through carefully editing with the sole intent of embarrasing the President Of The United States in front of the entire world, friend & foe alike.
That it follows the example of another network (CBS) having one of their top producers as well as their star attraction, the 'face of the network's news division' Dan Rather, go to air with 'falsified documents' harmful to the sitting President during his re-election bid. Though some might see that as psychotic behavior, Big Media hides behind the First Amendment and the "Freedom of the Press" guarantees it affords them as they make their half-hearted apologies for the many inaccuracies, falacies or outright lies they put forth on page one or as the lead story of their nightly broadcats on a regular basis.
The newspaper industry buries any & all apologies deep inside their publications, while the television medium has taken to posting theirs on their corporate websites, both designs meant to keep their apologies from ever being seen, read or heard by as many readers or viewers as can possibly be accomplished. Certainly not nearly as many of those who had obviously been privy to the original charge while it occupies its prominent placement on first airing.
But keeping facts from the public seems not to bother those editors, publishers, producers & other decision makers inside the Big Media bubble. To them the truth is obviously what they tell you it is and, one of the most influential newspapers in the country, perhaps the world even bills itself as being the arbiter of "all the news thats fit to print". Think about those words for a moment.

Yet because they can never lay claim to having a motive for their intense dislike of the Commander In Chief or for their promoting of one agenda over another lest their objectivity, or lack thereof comes into question. Motive would instantly bring into question Big Media's reliability and, truthfulness which is blindly accepted by far too many Americans who should be asking tough questions of Big Media mavens like Salzberger, Imelt and others. Admitting to motive would be the equivalent of admitting to the aforementioned bias, a charge steadfastly denied by the media heavyweights over the years.

Motive, Agenda, Bias. The troika! And this election year more people have been forced to come face to face with the overly slanted coverage of the process by none other than Big Media, their bias is that obvious. This same media has in great measure, informed the country of who the ultimate choices for president would be and, I don't think it takes a 'Magic 8 Ball' to peer into the future to be able to say with confidence that Big Media is going to do its best to influence the upcoming General Election. How else would they achieve the desired result of moving their own agenda forward? It is their version of truth, justice and, the American way!

Manipulation of the masses. Nothing more, nothing less.

The movers & shakers of Big Media however, have finally exposed themselves as having the capacity to equally despise more than one person at a time. They have shown the viewing public this one undeniable truth - they find it easy being equal opportunity haters. With a venom usually reserved only for the current President & his administration, Big Media has attacked not only the candidacy of Hillary Clinton but the very person of Hillary Clinton. All the while professing their admiration, their love for the young, unknown and, inexperienced black candidate Barak Hussein Obama. Informing us that we should follow their lead and, admire him too. Because, after all he is black!

Though we would like to believe the skincolor of a president should not be an issue, in this election year Big Media has made it the central issue. When faced with a choice the men who made the decisions regarding how the candidates were to be treated in the press chose color over gender as the deal-buster. Surely, the treatment of Mrs Clinton, former First Lady, sitting Junior Senator from New York would qualify 'Pinch' Salzberger of 'The New York Times' and Jeffrey Imelt, CEO of GE & NBC for membership in the 'Knuckle-Dragging, Neanderthal, Woman-Haters Club' (my sincerest to 'The Little Rascals"). But the Big Boys of Big Media thought it better to be thought a sexist than proven a racist.

Such is life in the world of a PC-Liberal. They truly don't see the racism evident in their own thoughts & actions. So, in much the same way they weighed in on who the Republican candidate should be and we dutifully obeyed, Big Media is continuing to further their agenda by filling in the the other side of the ballot for the Democratic Party. And make no mistake, they too (Dems, Libs, & some Independents) will dutifully obey. The final choices this November seem destined to be between bad, and worse. Much, much worse.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »